Page 3 of 37
Attainment in English:
•
In 2016-2017 62.7
% (96 students)
of pupils at Manchester Academy
achieved a ‘standard pass’ of Grade 4+ in English
•
60.8% ( 73 students)
of disadvantaged pupils achieved this benchmark
compared to 69.7
% (23 students)
of non-disadvantaged pupils
•
In 2016-2017
43.8% (67 students)
of pupils at Manchester Academy
achieved a ‘good pass’ of Grade 5+ in English
•
44.2% (53 students)
of disadvantaged pupils achieved this benchmark
compared to
42.4% (14 students)
of non-disadvantaged pupils
Attainment in maths:
•
In 2016-2017
48.4% (74 students)
of pupils at Manchester Academy
achieved a ‘standard pass’ of Grade 4+ in maths
•
45.8% (55 students)
of disadvantaged pupils achieved this benchmark
compared to
57.6% (19 students)
of non-disadvantaged pupils
•
In 2016-2017 36.6
% (56 students)
of pupils at Manchester Academy
achieved a ‘good pass’ of Grade 5+ in maths
•
35% (42 students)
of disadvantaged pupils achieved this benchmark
compared to 42.4
% (14 students)
of non-disadvantaged pupils
Attainment 8:
•
In 2016-17 the ‘Attainment 8’ average points score per pupil at Manchester Academy was
39.90
•
The ‘Attainment 8’ average points score for PP pupils at Manchester Academy was
39.50
•
The ‘Attainment 8’ average points score for non-disadvantaged pupils at Manchester Academy was
41.36
Progress:
•
In 2016-2017 the Progress 8 score for all Y11 pupils at Manchester Academy was
0.007
•
The Progress 8 score for disadvantaged pupils was
-0.030
•
The Progress 8 score for non-disadvantaged pupils was
0.156
•
Progress gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils at Manchester Academy is
0.186
Key Stage 3:
Pupil Premium funding impacts upon all pupils at Manchester Academy and benefits pupils in Years 7 to 10 as well as
impacting upon outcomes in GCSEs for Y11 pupils.
Year 7
At Assessment Point 6 (July 2017) -
19.4%
(30 students) - were on track in mathematics, whilst
11%
(17 students)
were
already exceeding expectations with regard to their progress.
26.4%
(41 students) of students were on track in English, whilst
25.8%
(40 students) exceeded expectations with re-
gard to their progress.
There was a gap of
7.7%
between the performance of non-disadvantaged and disadvantaged pupils in maths and a gap
of
2.1%
in English.
